Ayodhya verdict: a slap on pseudo secularists

The long awaited Ayodhya verdict has shocked the so called secularists.Whether they are politicians or human right activists or intellectuals or even media persons.They were very much hopeful for a secular verdict in the case,i.e., a decision in favour of Babari Masjid Action Committee and Sunni Waqf Board ,so that they may start the construction of a gorgeous mosque at that site,further more, may loud their voices for the punishment of culprits of Babari mosque demolition.This way may strengthen their muslim vote bank share.Every one was ready to catch this life time opportunity,to show and prove his real secularism,but  the judgment has poured cold water on their willing.                                                                                           It has become tradition in India to favour muslim sentiments at all cost,whether it is Shah Bano case or common civil code or family planing.Every time the muslim sentiments have been kept above all, even above national intrest That is why India is facing such acute problems like, population explosion,islamic terrorism and demographic changes by Bangladeshi from eastern boarder up to Delhi. But our secular politicians greedy of muslim votes by wholesale,cleverly and shamelessly  blame  poverty, illiteracy and unemployment for these problems.They even strongly oppose the expelling of Bangladeshi intruder declairing them poor and helpless  refugees.But what is happening in the boarder areas of West Bengal, clearly shows that they are neither poor nor helpless yet they are only ultra islamic goons. Please go to hindu samhati.blogspot.com for more details.They even do not hesitate to blame hindus for most of the problems.Now they have discovered a new slogan"our man power is our strength."Really???                                                                                          In 2003 when Archaeological Survey of India( ASI ) started excavation at disputed site of Ayodhya, the muslim side tried to stop it, by appealing in supreme court,however the apex court rejected their plea.Then they, along with secularists, demanded for one third muslim labourers in the excavation team and their demand was fulfilled.Imagine if such any demand would had been made by hindu side, what would had been the raction of so called secularists?Now they are claiming the reports and findings of ASI partial and unscientific.They are trying to raise fingers towards the ASI team who carried out survey at Ayodhya. .Remember these are the people who targeted Delhi police in Batala hose encounter,even after the martyrdom of police officer inspector Sharma of Delhi police.Later they outpern over Human Rights Commission(HRC) when the commission declared the encounter no fake.The all time favoured HRC suddenly gone villain.          The reaction of eminent? historian Irfan Habib has proved that, a muslim is first a muslim and later what so ever he may be.Interestingly most of the muslim intellectuals are wearing the mask of secularism,however the face inside the mask is not much different from the face of a traditional mullah. The only difference  is in the words they use.Traditional mullah  use words  straight and  strong  while  secular mullah are using clever secular words.Very interestingly no muslim country in the world follows the principle of secularism,even the state of  Jammu and Kashmir,the only muslim dominated state of india ,has not  accepted the secularism  in  his constitution. But all secularists want it , for the rest of india ,as necessary element.Hindus have been forced to carry this unwanted luggage,which is nothing but a slow poison for them.                                                   The Neharuvian secular activists  and media are trying hard to give voice to the dissatisfactions of muslims,presenting  secular muslim and non muslim  intellectuals and leaders in TV debates Even though the first and the main litigant in the case, from muslim side,Hamid Ansari, has expressed satisfaction over the judgment, this judgment is not acceptable to the seculrists.This judgment is a slap on the face of pseudo secularists.So on one side they are encouraging the muslim side to protest the judgment and appeal in the supreme court on the other side  they are trying to deliver a massage to the apex court, that, the judgment of Allahabad high court is partial and in favour of hindus and must be corrected. Muslim vote bagger politicians like Lalu Prasad, ,Mulayam Singh and Ram Vilas Paswan are on with their full capability of criticizing every thing which has gone unfavourable to muslim side. .                                                                                         But what if the judgment of supreme court also goes against them ?what would be their reaction?These are the people who have challenged police,army and the national institutions like ASI, HRC and even elected governments. I am feared soon they will be challenging the Indian judiciary and marching towards Hague.    At last i want to add one simple theory that may be used to solve such disputes.One may find it objectionable, but it is truth of hindu society.That is, the feelings of untouchability, whether by cast or by religion, in upper class hindus has been so strong in the past,  that, they would  never go to built any temple side by side with mosque or adjoining mosque or even within the court yards of any mosque.So if there are these two structures at one place as mentioned above then it is very clear that the existence of temple is prior than the mosque and muslims should leave all such places.